Kerangka Uji Penerimaan Berbasis Risiko untuk Menjamin Kualitas Pengadaan Radar Cuaca melalui Technical Representative, Factory Acceptance Test (FAT), dan Site Acceptance Test (SAT)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Radar cuaca berperan sebagai komponen utama dalam penyelenggaraan layanan observasi dan peringatan dini di bidang meteorologi, sehingga keandalannya tidak hanya ditentukan oleh kecanggihan teknologi, tetapi juga oleh kualitas tata kelola pengadaan dan mekanisme penerimaan sistem sebelum dioperasikan. Meskipun acceptance testing telah digunakan sebagai mekanisme penerimaan sistem, pendekatan tersebut sering diperlakukan sebagai tahapan administratif di akhir proyek dan belum sepenuhnya diposisikan sebagai instrumen manajemen risiko. Penelitian ini memformulasikan perspektif verifikasi–validasi, manajemen risiko, dan pengelolaan mutu proyek menjadi suatu kerangka uji penerimaan berjenjang yang sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa struktur pengujian berlapis mencegah akumulasi risiko teknis hingga fase operasional, serta mengurangi potensi rework dan eskalasi biaya.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] World Meteorological Organization, Guide to Operational Weather Radar Best Practices Volume I: Weather Radar Network Programme Design. Switzerland, 2023, pp. 1–48.
[2] A. Prakasa and F. D. Utami, “Sistem Informasi Radar Cuaca Terintegrasi BMKG,” Journal of Telecommunication, Electronics, and Control Engineering (JTECE), vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 78–87, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.20895/jtece.v1i02.89.
[3] M. Yeary, B. L. Cheong, J. M. Kurdzo, T.-Y. Yu, and R. Palmer, “Waveform Design for Emerging Radar Technologies IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine,” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, pp. 10–15, Oct. 2014.
[4] M. Putra, M. S. Rosid, and D. Handoko, “A Review of Rainfall Estimation in Indonesia: Data Sources, Techniques, and Methods,” Signals, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 542–561, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/signals5030030.
[5] J. Kruger, M. Elliott, and W. Hopper, “Factory Acceptance Testing: From Three Different Perspectives,” in IEEE Conference Record of Annual Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2024, pp. 58–66. doi: 10.1109/PPIC57149.2024.10902352.
[6] A. Kossiakoff, S. J. Seymour, D. A. Flanigan, and S. M. Biemer, “Front Matter,” in Systems Engineering Principles and Practice, Wiley, 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119516699.fmatter.
[7] IEEE Standard for System, Software, and Hardware Verification and Validation. New York: IEEE, 2017.
[8] BS ISO 31000:2018 Risk management - Guidelines, Second edition. Geneva: BSI, 2018.
[9] A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge, Sixth Edition. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017.
[10] T. Fischer and D. Dghyam, “Formal Model Validation through Acceptance Tests,” in International Conference on Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems, Springer, Apr. 2019, pp. 159–169.
[11] J.-A. Shim, H.-J. Kwon, H. Jung, and M.-S. Hwang, “Design of Acceptance Test Process with the Application of Agile Development Methodology,” International Journal of Control and Automation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 343–352, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.14257/ijca.2016.9.2.32.
[12] Peraturan Kepala Staf Angkatan Udara Nomor 14 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa. Indonesia, 2019, pp. 1–317.
[13] G. I. M. Worm, J. P. Kelderman, T. Lapikas, A. W. C. Van Der Helm, K. M. Van Schagen, and L. C. Rietveld, “The Use of Process Simulation Models in Virtual Commissioning of Process Automation Software in Drinking Water Treatment Plants,” Water Supply, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1331–1339, Sep. 2013.
[14] I. Lucas, “Testing Times in Computer Validation,” International Contributor, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 153–161, Feb. 2003.
[15] A. Rospawan, J. W. Simatupang, and I. Purnama, “IOT Application For Conveyor Motor Load Current And Temperature Monitoring Device for Factory Acceptance Test in Industrial Application,” Jurnal ELTIKOM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 152–162, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.31961/eltikom.v6i2.553.
[16] J. M. Juran and A. B. Godfrey, Juran’s Quality Handbook, Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, 1999.