Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and Future Directions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed forensic accounting practices, particularly in supporting fraud detection and financial investigations. As the number of publications in this field continues to grow, a comprehensive mapping of the literature is needed to understand the global evolution of research. This study aims to examine the development of research on AI in forensic accounting using a bibliometric approach. Bibliographic data were retrieved from the Scopus database following the PRISMA framework. After the screening process, 399 articles published between January 2015 and July 2026 were analyzed using Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix) in RStudio. The findings reveal a consistent increase in research output, with an annual growth rate of 42.84%, particularly since 2022. China emerged as the leading contributor in terms of both publications and citations, while Knowledge-Based Systems and Decision Support Systems were identified as the most productive journals in this research area. Keyword analysis indicates that machine learning, fraud detection, artificial intelligence, deep learning, and financial fraud remain the dominant research themes, reflecting an increasing emphasis on advanced AI technologies. Furthermore, Lotka's Law suggests that this research field is still in its growth stage, whereas Bradford's Law indicates that publications are concentrated within a relatively small number of core journals. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of AI research in forensic accounting and identifies several promising directions for future research, including Explainable AI, Responsible AI, Large Language Models, and AI governance.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Cerón, J., Rodríguez, M., & López, J. (2026). Artificial intelligence applications in auditing and forensic accounting: Emerging trends and research opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature.
Crumbley, D. L., Heitger, L. E., & Smith, G. S. (2017). Forensic and Investigative Accounting (9th ed.). CCH.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., & Ahuja, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies.
Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122.
Lario, C. S. E., & Rohman, A. (2025). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Detection in Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan.
Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rezaee, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). Relevance of big data to forensic accounting practice and education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(3), 268–288.
Sharon, C., Lario, E., & Rohman, A. (2025). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Detection in Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 11(2), 151–162. http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/ap
Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2023). The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated: Artificial intelligence research in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50, 100641.
Zakaria, Z. N. Z., Hussain, N. H. C., Awang, Y., & Shuhidan, S. M. (2025). Smart Forensics: Tracing the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Accounting, Fraud Detection and Risk Management. Information Management and Business Review.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629