Tren Penelitian tentang Disinformasi dalam Konflik Rusia–Ukraina 2022–2025: Analisis Bibliometrik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Konflik Rusia-Ukraina sejak 2022 telah memicu lonjakan penelitian tentang disinformasi sebagai senjata hibrida dalam perang informasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan tren penelitian disinformasi dalam konflik tersebut selama periode 2022–2025 melalui analisis bibliometrik. Menggunakan data dari Scopus, sebanyak 565 artikel dianalisis dengan VOSviewer dan Biblioshiny untuk mengidentifikasi tren publikasi, pola kolaborasi penulis/institusi/negara, serta kluster kata kunci. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan publikasi (rerata 73,55% per tahun), dominasi penulis seperti Mykola Makhortykh, institusi seperti Charles University, dan negara seperti Amerika Serikat. Kata kunci dominan meliputi "disinformation", "Russia", dan "Ukraine", dengan empat kluster tematik: perang informasi dan propaganda, konflik dan narasi kognitif, pendekatan teknologi, serta respons masyarakat dan literasi media. Temuan ini menegaskan disinformasi sebagai ancaman strategis keamanan nasional, dengan implikasi untuk penguatan ketahanan informasi. Penelitian mendatang direkomendasikan fokus pada disinformasi visual dan integrasi data real-time.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Dean, M. C., & Porter, B. (2025). Sentiment Analysis of Russian-Language Social Media Posts Discussing the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Armed Forces and Society, 51(4), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241235987
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
European Parliament. (2025). European Parliament resolution of 23 January 2025 on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. Wiley.
Hasan, M. (2024). Russia–Ukraine Propaganda on Social Media: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journalism and Media, 5(3), 980–992. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030062
Helmus, T. C., & Holynska, K. (2024). Ukrainian Resistance to Russian Disinformation: Lessons for Future Conflict. www.rand.org/t/RRA2771-1.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-56-66
Ivan, C., Chiru, I., & Arcos, R. (2024). Hybrid security threats and the information domain – concepts and definitions. In R. Arcos, I. Chiru, & C. Ivan (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disinformation and National Security (Part 1). Routledge.
Johnstone, C. B., & Klaas, L. (2024). Combating disinformation: An agenda for U.S.-Japan cooperation.
Karpchuk, N. (2021). THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PROPAGANDA NARRATIVES. Torun International Studies, 1(14), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.12775/tis.2021.002
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871264
Oleinik, A. (2025). Digital and mass media coverage of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine compared: Uniformity within countries and diversity between countries. International Communication Gazette. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485251357866
Pierri, F., Jindal, N., Luceri, L., & Ferrara, E. (2023). Propaganda and Misinformation on Facebook and Twitter during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference’17), 2657. https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
Porter, E., Scott, R. B., Wood, T. J., & Zhandayeva, R. (2024). Correcting misinformation about the Russia-Ukraine War reduces false beliefs but does not change views about the War. PLoS ONE, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307090
Sherstoboeva, E. (2024). Russian Bans on ‘Fake News’ about the war in Ukraine: Conditional truth and unconditional loyalty. International Communication Gazette, 86(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231220141
Suing, A. (2025). Disinformation in Crisis Contexts—Perception of Russia Today’s Narratives in Ecuador. Journalism and Media, 6(4), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040192
Vériter, S. L. (2025). The collective securitization of “disinformation” and the EU’s ban on Russia Today and Sputnik. International Affairs, 101(5), 1853–1876. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf139
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. www.coe.int
Zecchinon, P., & Standaert, O. (2025). The War in Ukraine Through the Prism of Visual Disinformation and the Limits of Specialized Fact-Checking. A Case-Study at Le Monde. Digital Journalism, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2332609