Isu Sosial Kontemporer: Dinamika Kesempatan Kerja, Pendapatan, Dan Kohesi Sosial Di Kawasan Perkotaan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Perkembangan aktivitas dunia usaha di kawasan perkotaan tidak hanya membawa perubahan dalam struktur ekonomi, tetapi juga memengaruhi hubungan sosial dan kehidupan budaya masyarakat di sekitarnya. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis dinamika sosial ekonomi dan budaya masyarakat dalam menghadapi perkembangan aktivitas usaha, dengan menitikberatkan pada kesempatan kerja, peningkatan pendapatan, partisipasi masyarakat, dan kohesi sosial. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan memanfaatkan data wawancara terhadap 35 responden, observasi lingkungan sosial, dan dokumentasi kegiatan operasional usaha. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa aktivitas usaha memberikan kontribusi terhadap terbukanya kesempatan kerja dan berkembangnya kegiatan ekonomi lokal. Namun, manfaat ekonomi tersebut belum sepenuhnya menjawab harapan masyarakat mengenai pemerataan kesempatan kerja dan prioritas tenaga kerja lokal. Pada dimensi sosial budaya, masyarakat masih mempertahankan praktik gotong royong, kegiatan keagamaan, dan hubungan lintas etnis, meskipun perubahan pola kehidupan perkotaan turut memengaruhi intensitas interaksi sosial. Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa pembangunan ekonomi perkotaan perlu memperhatikan distribusi manfaat ekonomi, partisipasi masyarakat, dan keberlanjutan kohesi sosial.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adianto, J., Gabe, R. T., & Hernowo, B. (2024). Pandemic at the Gates: The Improvement of Social Capital and Collective Efficacy in Neighbourhoods of the Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Area. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 15(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253241234698
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Alwi, A. (2025a). Faith , Culture , and the River : Socio-Religious Dimensions of Waste Disposal Practices in Indonesia. Reflektif, Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(1), 161–184.
Alwi, A. (2025b). Habitus dan Strategi Bertahan Hidup Mahasiswa Marginal: Kajian Sosiologis Terhadap Penghuni Asrama Sulawesi Tenggara di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Perspektif, 8(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v8i3.1280
Alwi, A., Ram, S. W., & Dinda, L. O. (2024). Social Solidarity of The Wadiabero-Haiya People Diaspora. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v4i2.1242
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2025). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(2), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244
Breakey, H., Wood, G., & Sampford, C. (2025). Understanding and defining the social license to operate: Social acceptance, local values, overall moral legitimacy, and ‘moral authority.’ Resources Policy, 102, 105488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105488
Creswell., J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five approaches - 3rd edition. In Экономика Региона.
Gehrke, E., Genthner, R., & Kis-Katos, K. (2025). Regulating manufacturing FDI: Local labor market responses to a protectionist policy in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 177, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103563
Ham, U. (2025). The Implementation of the Social Licence to Operate (SLO) Concept in Nickel Mining Governance in Kolaka Regency. PCD Journal, 13(1), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v13i1.16659
Ho, S. S. H., Oh, C. H., & Shapiro, D. (2024). Can Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Social License? A Sentiment and Emotion Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 61(2), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12863
Hofstad, H., Dahl, C., Følling, K., Mouratidis, K., Olsen, B. O., Sagen, S. B., & Zeiner, H. H. (2025). Community Social Sustainability: Unpacking the Concept for Urban Governance and Planning. Sustainable Development, 33(3), 3970–3984. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3327
Hornok, C., & Raeskyesa, D. G. S. (2024). Economic zones and local income inequality: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 22(1), 69–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-023-09581-x
Nicmanis, M. (2024). Reflexive Content Analysis: An Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis, Reduction, and Description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241236603
Otor, S., Bice, S., & Henderson, H. (2026). Social Licence to Operate and Major Infrastructure: A Social Exchange Theory Approach to Modelling Drivers of Community Acceptance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(3), 3225–3246. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70317
Sankofa, N. (2023). Critical method of document analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(6), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2113664
Sen, K. (2024). Broken Ladders? Labour Market Inequality in Indonesia and India. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(2), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2389593
Syamsidar, S., Rusdiah, R., Syamsu, A., & Wahyuni, W. (2026). Negotiating Social Cohesion in Multicultural Urban Indonesia: Interaction and Adaptation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.66815/ejecs/2947
Widita, A. A., Lechner, A. M., & Widyastuti, D. T. (2024). Spatial patterns and drivers of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) within and across Indonesian cities: Evidence from highly granular data. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(11), 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100137
Wihardja, M. M., & Pradana, A. T. (2024). Examining the drivers of changes in mean earnings and earnings inequality in Indonesia. Asian Economic Journal, 38(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12332