Semiotic Analysis on Flannery O’connor’s A Good Man is Hard to Find

Main Article Content

Ni Luh Ade Ulan Antari

Abstract

The title of this study is Semiotic Analysis on Flannery O’Connor’s A Good Man Is Hard to Find. This study focuses on the analysis of icons, indexes, and symbols in the short story. The data was taken from A Good Man Is Hard to Find short story. This study analyzes the sign based on three of the six sign species in Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics (Sebeok, Second Edition 2001), these three species are Charles Peirce's classification of signs, namely icon, index, and symbol. This study used the documentation method for collecting data. In analyzing the data, this study applied the qualitative method to present the data because the data was collected in the form of words and was analyzed based on the theory applied in this study using words and sentences. In presenting the data, quotes from the short stories are used as the data. The result shows the icons, indexes, and symbols found in the short stories. There are a total of thirteen data in this study, including four data for icons, seven data for indexes, and two data for symbols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ni Luh Ade Ulan Antari. (2022). Semiotic Analysis on Flannery O’connor’s A Good Man is Hard to Find. ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(10), 364–3372. Retrieved from https://al-haramjournal.co.id/JIM/article/view/825
Section
Articles

References

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among The Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ennion, E.R., and Tinbergen, N. (1967). Tracks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

O'Connor, M.F. (1953). A Good Man is Hard to Find [Internet]. The Avon Book of Modern Writing. Available from: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/160332/A%20good%20man%20is%20hard%20to%20find%20-%20Flannery%20O%27Connor.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2021].

Roberts, D. (1973). The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.

Sebeok, T.A., (2001). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto Buffalo London: University of Toronto Press.

Todorov, T. (1973). Semiotics. Screen 14: 15-23.

Zaim, M. 2014. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. Padang: Sukabina Press.

Zeman, J.J. (1964). The Graphical Logic of C.S. Peirce. Dissertation, University of Chicago.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.