Cost-Benefit Dilemmas in Modern Military Procurement: The Case of Australia’s Nuclear Submarine Program

Main Article Content

Meli Ruslinar
Marsetio Marsetio
Asep Adang Supriyadi
Lukman Yudho Prakoso

Abstract

Artikel ini mengevaluasi dilema biaya-manfaat dari program akuisisi kapal selam bertenaga nuklir Australia melalui pakta AUKUS, yang disepakati dengan Amerika Serikat dan Inggris pada tahun 2021. Meskipun proyek ini diklaim sebagai langkah strategis untuk memperkuat pertahanan bawah laut Australia di kawasan Indo-Pasifik, berbagai kritik telah muncul terkait lonjakan biaya, ketidakpastian jadwal, dan dampaknya terhadap kebijakan luar negeri. Dengan estimasi biaya mencapai AUD 368 miliar, proyek ini menjadi investasi pertahanan terbesar Australia dalam 30 tahun terakhir. Namun, beban fiskal, ketergantungan teknologi asing, dan keterlambatan pengiriman hingga pertengahan 2030-an menimbulkan pertanyaan serius mengenai efektivitas jangka pendek sistem pertahanan tersebut. Di sisi lain, meskipun kapal selam nuklir menawarkan keunggulan strategis seperti jangkauan dan ketahanan operasional, dampak geopolitik dan persepsi ancaman dari negara-negara tetangga seperti ASEAN dan Tiongkok berpotensi memperburuk stabilitas regional dan mendorong perlombaan senjata. Selain itu, keterlibatan yang semakin dalam dalam arsitektur pertahanan Amerika Serikat dapat mempersempit ruang diplomasi independen Australia dan mengurangi fleksibilitas posisinya di tengah dinamika Indo-Pasifik yang multipolar. Melalui pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, artikel ini menekankan perlunya Australia mengadopsi mekanisme evaluasi pengadaan militer yang lebih adaptif dan berbasis risiko. Tujuannya adalah untuk menyeimbangkan kebutuhan penangkalan berteknologi tinggi dengan pendekatan kolaboratif dan efisien dalam membangun ketahanan maritim. Dengan demikian, proyek AUKUS harus dipertimbangkan tidak hanya sebagai alat pertahanan, tetapi juga sebagai komponen strategis dalam arsitektur keamanan regional yang menuntut kehati-hatian, fleksibilitas, dan perhitungan geopolitik yang matang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meli Ruslinar, Marsetio, M., Asep Adang Supriyadi, & Lukman Yudho Prakoso. (2025). Cost-Benefit Dilemmas in Modern Military Procurement: The Case of Australia’s Nuclear Submarine Program. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 5(1), 2190–2206. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v5i1.12705
Section
Articles

References

ASPI. (2015). The cost of defence: ASPI defence budget brief 2015–16. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

ASPI. (2022). Defence budget brief 2022–23. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

Bisley, N., & Schreer, B. (2022). AUKUS and the Indo-Pacific: A strategic shift or symbolic gesture? International Affairs, 98(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac125

Bitzinger, R. A. (2021). Rebalancing Australia’s defence budget: Between strategic needs and fiscal realities. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs43-1c

Brzoska, M. (2018). The economics of arms procurement: Theory, policy, and cases. Defence and Peace Economics, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1325615

Davies, A., & Thomson, M. (2022). Australia’s defence budget: Planning for the long term. Australian Strategic Policy Institute. https://www.aspi.org.au/report/defence-budget-2022

Davies, A., & Thomson, M. (2024). Australia’s defence spending and AUKUS implications. ASPI Research Paper.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Department of Defence (DoD). (2018). 2018 Defence White Paper: Ensuring Australia’s security in a changing region. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Dunne, J. P., & Skons, E. (2021). Military spending and development. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1081

Fitzpatrick, M., & Shearer, A. (2020). Avoiding the submarine capability gap: Australia’s maritime strategy after Collins. Australian Naval Review, 33(2), 23–38.

Flugge, M. L. (2019). Cost-benefit analysis in military project evaluation. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 3(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDAL-03-2019-0006

Garnaut, J. (2023). Nuclear ambitions: The economic and strategic consequences of AUKUS. Asia Policy, 35, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0014

Goh, E. (2016). Southeast Asia’s strategic relations with the United States: A hedging strategy. Asian Survey, 56(3), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.3.522

GovAU. (2021). AUKUS trilateral security partnership joint statement. Canberra: Australian Government.

Hartley, K. (2016). The economics of defence policy: A new perspective. Routledge.

Jennings, P. (2019). Australia’s submarine strategy: The rise and fall of the Attack-class. Naval War College Review, 72(3), 60–78.

Jennings, P. (2022). Australia’s submarine saga: Collins to AUKUS. Naval War College Review, 75(1), 45–60.

Katsumata, H. (2019). Hedging and regional order in Southeast Asia: The role of ASEAN. Pacific Review, 32(5), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1569110

Kuik, C. C. (2020). The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to China’s rise. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(3), 338–365. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs42-3c

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Naturalistic Inquiry (Rev. ed.). Sage Publications.

Markowski, S., & Hall, P. (2015). The challenges of defence procurement. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2015.1023384

Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific empire: China, America and the contest for the world's pivotal region. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1712094

Murphy, A. M. (2021). Indonesia and the Indo-Pacific: Recalibrating a foreign policy identity. International Affairs, 97(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa168

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Rajagopalan, R. P. (2022). Alliance exclusivity and regional fragmentation: AUKUS and strategic stability. The Washington Quarterly, 45(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2062585

Reilly, J. (2022). Hedging or balancing? Australia’s China strategy under scrutiny. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(133), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1966891

Snyder, G. H. (2021). Strategic ambiguity and deterrence in asymmetric alliances. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(6), 871–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1877174

Storey, I., & Emmers, R. (2021). Naval strategy and future submarine procurement in the Indo-Pacific. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs43-3d

Tan, S. S., & Koh, C. T. (2021). Maritime ambiguity and strategic misalignment in the Indo-Pacific. Marine Policy, 134, 104802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104802

Tan, S. S., & Singh, B. (2021). Australia’s strategic recalibration in the Indo-Pacific: From hedging to hard alignment? Defense and Security Analysis, 37(4), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2021.2003246

Taylor, B. (2021). Strategic ambiguity and the risks of AUKUS. Survival, 63(6), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.2006823

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.