Criticism of Positivism and Its Relevance to Az-Zahabi's Criticism of Ibn 'Arabi's Interpretation

Main Article Content

Asnadi Asnadi
Aldomi Putra

Abstract

Since the 19th century, positivism has prevailed in modern science via empirical observation, sensory verification, and objective reason. Although it has propelled advancements in science and technology, positivism fosters reductionism, thereby marginalizing unquantifiable entities, including spiritual and metaphysical realities. This constraint is particularly manifest in Islamic studies, notably in Sufi exegesis of the Qur'an, which depends on symbolism, inner signs, and spiritual experiences. Ibn ‘Arabi, a distinguished Sufi philosopher, offers speculative and figurative exegeses in texts such as al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah and Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam, sometimes criticised for straying from literal orthodoxy. Az-Zahabi, a distinguished hadith scholar, denounced these interpretations as perilous, emphasising textual integrity and rational criteria over spiritual insights. These discussions highlight epistemological challenges between empirical rigor and transcendent sources of knowledge. This study uses a qualitative library research methodology to epistemologically examine Az-Zahabi’s critique of Ibn ‘Arabi’s interpretations of the Qur’an. An interdisciplinary approach integrates the philosophy of science with Qur’anic exegesis. Primary sources encompass Az-Zahabi’s Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalā’ and Mizān al-Iʿtidal, in addition to the principal works of Ibn ‘Arabi. Secondary sources offer theoretical and contextual assistance. Data analysis employs descriptive and interpretive methodologies, including literature reviews, textual analyses to reveal interpretive assumptions, epistemological evaluations, and comparative syntheses. The findings demonstrate the insufficiency of positivism for esoteric religious knowledge, mirroring Az-Zahabi's argument centered on orthodoxy. Ibn ‘Arabi’s approach prioritises spiritual realisation above empirical constraints, facilitating a more profound understanding of texts. Critiquing positivism fosters an awareness of multiple Islamic epistemologies and methodological diversity, facilitating a comprehensive study of sacred texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Asnadi, A., & Putra, A. (2026). Criticism of Positivism and Its Relevance to Az-Zahabi’s Criticism of Ibn ’Arabi’s Interpretation. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 5(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.56799/j-ceki.v5i3.14554
Section
Articles

References

Burhanuddin, N. (2022). Sirhindi’s Criticism of the Wahdat al-Wujud in Ibn ’Arabi Course. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 22(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.22.2022.243

Chittick, W. C. (2024). The Sufi Path of Knowledge. In The Sufi Path of Knowledge. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.18252566

Fina, L. I. N. (2018). Ibn ‘Arabī, Fiqh, and a Literal Reading of the Qur’an: Approaching the Outward Divine Commands as a Spiritual Realization. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 19(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v19i2.1135

Firnando, H. G. (2024). Murtadha Muthahhari Ecological Vision: Unveiling the Spiritual Foundation of Harmony Between Humans and Nature in Islamic Ecology. In Humanika (Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. 198–207). https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v30i2.59354

Habibani, R. A., & Fatimah, S. (2024). Positivisme: Konsep, Perkembangan, Dan Implementasi Dalam Kajian Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Hukum. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 4(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v4i4.3831

Halim, A. (2024). Ta’wīl as Quranic Hermeneutics in the Philosophical Thought of Ibn ‘Arabī. Islamic Studies Review, 3(2), 260–288. https://doi.org/10.56529/isr.v3i2.326

Husni, & Hayden, W. (2024). The Epistemology of Ta’dib in Islamic Civilizational Discourse: Reviving and Reconstructing Contemporary Muslim Scholars’ Views. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 19(1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol19no1.14

Izutsu, T., Corbin, H., & Manheim, R. (1970). Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn ’Arabi. Philosophy East and West, 20(4), 433. https://doi.org/10.2307/1397831

Jabar, S., Fitrisia, A., & Fatimah, S. (2024). Peran Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Mengembangkan Metode Penelitian Ilmiah. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 4(4), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v4i4.3821

Jedlicka, P., & Havenith, M. N. (2025). Religious and spiritual experiences from a neuroscientific and complex systems perspective. In Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (Vol. 177, p. 106319). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106319

Khasani, F. (2025). Ecological Ethics of the Prophet: A Hadith-Based Framework for Islamic Environmental Thought. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 3(03), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i03.1845

Lala, I. (2021). Qur’ānic Knowledge and Akbarian Wisdom: Ibn ‘Arabī‘s Daring Hermeneutics in Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 25(1), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.851857

Lala, I. (2022). The Epistemic Status of Mystical Experience in Ibn ʻArabī’s Legal Reasoning. Religions, 13(11), 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111051

Liang, J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2 nd Edition). Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 408–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1688620

Mazur, L. B. (2021). The Epistemic Imperialism of Science. Reinvigorating Early Critiques of Scientism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609823

Mohammed Khalili, K. (2024). Criticisms on Ontological Relativism of Modern Science By Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Al-Shajarah, 29(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v29i1.1832

Moris, M. (2021). Ibn al-‘arabĪ’s concept of dreams. Al-Shajarah, 26(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v26i1.998

Nugraha, A. R., & Naupal, N. (2019). Dialogue Between Islam and Environmental Ethics Through the Seyyed Hossein Nasr Thought. International Review of Humanities Studies, 4(3), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.7454/irhs.v0i0.204

Porter, S. L., Baehr, J., Porter, T., & Roberts, R. C. (2022). On the Integration of Positive Psychology and the Psychology of Religion/Spirituality: Logical, Normative, and Methodological Questions. In Handbook of Positive Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (pp. 37–51). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10274-5_3

Stoeber, M. (2015). The Comparative Study of Mysticism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.93

Syukri, Adenan, & Syahminan. (2025). Reinterpreting Justice in Al-Farabi’s Political Philosophy: Relevance to Contemporary Islamic Human Rights Thought. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10466

Yaden, D. B., Haidt, J., Hood, R. W., Vago, D. R., & Newberg, A. B. (2017). The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102

Yus, S., Walidin, W., & Sain, Z. H. (2024). Positivism and Postpositivism: A Paradigmatic Analysis of Science and Islamic Education in Indonesia. At-Ta’lim : Media Informasi Pendidikan Islam, 23(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.29300/attalim.v23i2.6364