Menakar Kualitas Penalaran Hukum dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kupang Nomor 41/G/2022/PTUN.KPG
Main Article Content
Abstract
The focus in this article is: why did the Panel of Judges exclude the requirement to submit an administrative objection before filing a lawsuit in the Kupang State Administrative Court decision Number: 41/G/2022/PTUN.KPG, dated 28 October 2022? and what is the quality of the legal reasoning of the Panel of Judges in excluding the need to submit administrative objections before filing a lawsuit in the decision of the Kupang State Administrative Court Number: 41/G/2022/PTUN.KPG, dated 28 October 2022 2022?. The reason the Panel of Judges excluded the requirement to submit an administrative objection before filing a lawsuit in the decision of the Kupang State Administrative Court Number: 41/G/2022/PTUN.KPG, dated 28 October 2022 was based on several things, firstly the filing of an administrative objection by the Plaintiff had already passed and was impossible can be repeated so that the calculation of the deadline for filing administrative objections is no longer possible for the Plaintiff. Second, substantial legal facts were found which could invalidate the object of the dispute so that the formality provisions of the lawsuit regarding time limits and administrative efforts in the dispute had to be set aside. The authors also conclude that the legal reasoning of the Panel of Judges in excluding the need to submit administrative objections before filing a lawsuit in the Kupang State Administrative Court decision Number: 41/G/2022/PTUN.KPG, dated 28 October 2022 is not logical and perfect.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adullah Rozali. (1992). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Ali Achmad. (1996). Menguak tabir hukum, Jakarta:Chandra Pratama.
Amiruddin. & Asikin Zainal. (2003). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: PT.Raja Grafindo.
Atmosudirdjo S. Prajudi. (1976). Masalah Organisasi Peradilan Administrasi, Simposium Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Bandung:Binacipta.
Darmodihardjo Darji & Shidarta. (2006). Pokok-pokok filsafat hukum (Apa dan bagaimana filsafat hukum Indonesia, Jakarta:PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ekon Yanto M.P, Kapitan Rian Van Frits & Mau Ellon Bellwan Cornelius. (2023). Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum, Jurnal Iblam Law Review, 3, (1).
Fachrudin Irfan. (2004). Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah, Bandung:PT. Alumni.
Guyanie Gugun El Guyanie. (2021). Eksistensi dan Urgensi Upaya Administratif dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam, 1, (2).
HR Ridwan. (2003). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Yogyakarta:UII Press.
Kapitan Rian Van Frits & Rafael Tontji Cristian. (2020). Penerapan Asas Contra Legem oleh Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Spectrum Hukum, 17, (1).
Marbun S.F. (2015). Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta:FH UII Press.
Marzuki Peter Mahmud. (2019). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Ramlan Subakti. (2001). Memahami Ilmu Politik, Jakarta:PT Gramedia.
S Irzha Friskanov & Abdullah. (2021). Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dalam Mengadili Perkara Fiktif Positif, Riau Law Journal, 5, (1).
Said Abdul Rauf Alauddin. (2015). Pembagian Kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat-Pemerintah Daerah dalam Otonomi Seluas-luasnya Menurut UUD 1945, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fiat Justisia, 9, (5).
Soemitro Rochmat. (1989). Masalah Peradilan Administrasi Dalam Hukum Pajak di Indonesia, Bandung:PT.Eresco.
Yanti Herma & Masriyani. (2019). Implementasi Perluasan Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jambi, Jurnal Legalitas, XI, (2).