Fostering Communicative Competence Through Simple Project-Based Learning Approaches
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in enhancing the speaking skills of students at SMAN 1 Sembalun. Using a pre-experimental design with pre-test and post-test assessments, the research involved 16 eleventh-grade students. The results indicated a significant improvement in speaking abilities, with the average pre-test score of 48.75 increasing to an average post-test score of 71.56 after the PBL intervention. This shift reflected enhanced pronunciation, fluency, and grammar usage, demonstrating that students became more confident communicators. While PBL proved beneficial, challenges such as time constraints and the need for effective facilitation were identified. This research contributed to the growing body of evidence supporting PBL as an effective pedagogical approach, highlighting its potential to foster independent learning and improve communication skills.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927167
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Canale, M. (2014). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy1. In Language and communication (pp. 2-27). Routledge.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Fauziati, E. (2014). Methods of teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL): Traditional method, designer method, communicative approach, scientific approach. Surakarta: Era Pustaka Utama.
Kavlu, A. (2017). Implementation of project based learning (PBL) in EFL (English as a foreign language) classrooms in Fezalar educational institutions (Iraq). International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2), 67-79. https://eprints.tiu.edu.iq/id/eprint/629
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? a performance evaluation. Education Sciences, 10(11), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110330
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Putri, N. L. P. N. S., Artini, L. P., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2017). Project-based learning activities and EFL students' productive skills in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6).
Riswandi, D. (2018). The implementation of project-based learning to improve students’ speaking skill. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 2(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v2i1.4609
Thyer, B. A. (2010). Pre-experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. The handbook of social work research methods, 183.
Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving student creative thinking skills through project based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 408-421. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4732
Žerovnik, A., & Nančovska Šerbec, I. (2021). Project-based learning in higher education. Technology supported active Learning: Student-centered approaches, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2082-9_3