Scientific Morality in the Use of Technology as a Study of the Philosophy of Science on Ethics in the Digital Era
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this research is to study scientific morality in the use of technology in the digital era from the perspective of philosophy of science. In the philosophy of science, scientific morality seeks to ensure that technological and scientific developments are driven by ethical and logical considerations. Based on moral values, the use of scientific knowledge not only produces technical progress, but is also socially responsible, making better technology more beneficial to society. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method. The main data source in this research is literature which includes books on the philosophy of science, scientific journals on digital ethics, articles related to scientific morality, as well as previous reports and research on technology in the digital era. Data collection was carried out through literature study, with data analysis using content analysis techniques. Artificial intelligence offers opportunities for progress, but also moral challenges, so developers, policymakers, and society need to collaborate to develop an ethical framework that ensures fair use of the technology and benefits society.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Allhoff, F. &. (2018). The internet of things: Foundational ethical issues. Internet of Things, 55-56.
Asrulla, A. S. (2024). KONSEPSI ETIKA, MORAL, DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUMANISME. Jurnal Genta Mulia, 257-268.
Bankins, S. (2021). The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework. Ethics and Information Technology, 841-854.
Chancel, L. (2020). nsustainable inequalities: Social justice and the environment. Harvard: Belknap Pres.
Dan, V. P. (2021). Visual mis-and disinformation, social media, and democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 661-664.
Dhirani, L. L. (2023). Ethical dilemmas and privacy issues in emerging technologies: A review. Sensors, 50-56.
Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds and machines, 411-437.
Hacker, P. (2023). Manipulation by algorithms. Exploring the triangle of unfair commercial practice, data protection, and privacy law. European Law Journal, 142-175.
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and machines, 99-120.
Huda, M. (2019). Empowering application strategy in the technology adoption: insights from professional and ethical engagement. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 172-192.
Hughes-Lartey, K. L. (2021). Human factor, a critical weak point in the information security of an organization's Internet of things. Heliyon.
Integrating internet of things, blockchain, and artificial intelligence techniques for intelligent industry solutions. (n.d.).
Johnson, J. (2023). Automating the OODA loop in the age of intelligent machines: reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age. Defence Studies, 43-67.
Johnson, T. L. (2022). Facial recognition systems in policing and racial disparities in arrests. Government Information Quarterly.
Kashif Ahmad, M. M. (2022). Developing future human-centered smart cities: Critical analysis of smart city security, Data management, and Ethical challenges. Computer Science Review.
Li, J. H. (2023). Methods and applications for Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Internet of Things, and Blockchain in smart energy management. nergy and AI.
Miteu, G. D. (2024). Ethics in scientific research: a lens into its importance, history, and future. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2359-2398.
Mulgan, T. (2016). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies.
Mustak, M. S. (2023). Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities. Journal of Business Research.
Nitin Liladhar Rane, Ö. K. (2024). Integrating internet of things, blockchain,. Deep Science Publishing, 115-136.
Richardson, R. (2021). Racial segregation and the data-driven society: How our failure to reckon with root causes perpetuates separate and unequal realities. Berkeley Tech.
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 1-31.
Van de Poel, I. &. (2023). Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wahyudi, A. I. (2024). Tinjauan Cabang Filsafat (Ontologi, Epistimologi, dan Aksiologi) dalam Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas IV SDN Patengteng 1. Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum, 34-45.
Wolfe, A. (2023). Whose keeper?: Social science and moral obligation.
Yen, C. P. (2021). Achieving equity with predictive policing algorithms: a social safety net perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1-16.
Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. Reutledge, 203-213.
Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social theory re-wired. Routladge, 203-213.