The Impact of Post-Potivism and Constructivism on Public Policy: A review of Philosophy of Science in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i2.7225
Keywords:
Keywords: Post-potivism, Constructivism, Public Policy, Philosophy of Science

Main Article Content

Retisfa Khairanis
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Istiadah Istiadah
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the impact of the post-positivist and constructivist paradigms on public policy in Indonesia from an academic perspective. The main focus of this research is how the two paradigms affect policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. The methodology used in this research is qualitative with a focus on literature analysis. Data sources come from several academic works related to post-positivism, constructivism, and public policy in Indonesia. The findings of this study show that while the post-positivist paradigm contributes to the development of a data-driven approach to multiple perspectives, the constructivist paradigm emphasizes the need to understand local social and cultural dynamics in decision-making. Both paradigms are highly effective in producing public policies that are more inclusive and accountable to the needs of the general public. The implication is that Indonesian policymakers should adopt a more critical and contextual approach to policymaking, and improve the application of epistemological principles in the policy development process. This research contributes to the development of philosophy of science discourse in the context of governance, particularly in Indonesia, by offering an alternative perspective to support more effective and successful governance.


Keywords: Post-potivism, Constructivism, Public Policy, Philosophy of Science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khairanis, R., & Istiadah, I. (2025). The Impact of Post-Potivism and Constructivism on Public Policy: A review of Philosophy of Science in Indonesia. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(2), 2101–2108. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i2.7225
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2: Februari 2025
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Aldi, M. (2024). INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY-BASED TEACHING METHODS IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN PADANG CITY: SHAPING THE GOLDEN GENERATION. As-Sulthan Journal of Education, 1(2), 239–252.

Amizar, G. (2011). STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH KOTA SOLO DALAM PEMINDAHAN PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA.

Basuki, J. (2018). Ekologi Administrasi Publik Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0: Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(2), 53–62.

Fahlefi, Z. (2017). Penerapan Teknologi Informasi Bagi Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus Pada BP2TSP Kota Samarinda). Jurnal Paradigma, 3(2), 155–166.

Firmansyah, D. K., Rochim, A. I., & Murti, I. (2024). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pengembangan Potensi Desa Berbasis Ketahanan Sosial, Ekonomi dan Lingkungan di Desa Candipari Kecamatan Porong Kabupaten Sidoarjo. PRAJA Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik (e-ISSN: 2797-0469), 4(04), 217–222.

Hardi, W. (2020). Collaborative Governance Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik.

Irawati, D., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2021a). Positivisme, pospositivisme, teori kritis, dan konstruktivisme dalam perspektif ‘epistemologi Islam.’ JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(8), 870–880.

Irawati, D., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2021b). Positivisme, pospositivisme, teori kritis, dan konstruktivisme dalam perspektif ‘epistemologi Islam.’ JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(8), 870–880.

Isnaini, D. (2017). Peranan Kebijakan Fiskal Dalam Sebuah Negara. Al-INTAJ: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1).

Judijanto, L., Wibowo, G. A., Karimuddin, K., Samsuddin, H., Patahuddin, A., Anggraeni, A. F., Raharjo, R., & Simorangkir, F. M. A. (2024). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Khairanis, R., & Aldi, M. (2024). Relevansi Filsafat Ilmu di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0: Sebuah Analisis Fenomenologis. CARONG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 87–97.

Lele, G. (2024). Kebijakan Publik Untuk Transformasi Sosial: Sebuah Pendekatan Kritis-Agonistik. UGM PRESS.

Ramadhani, A., & Winarno, A. (2025). Transformasi Pembelajaran Dengan Teknologi: Analisis Kritis Dari Lensa Teori Post-Positivisme, Kritis, Dan Konstruktivisme. Akhlak: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Filsafat, 2(1), 312–323.

Roosinda, F. W., Lestari, N. S., Utama, A. G. S., Anisah, H. U., Siahaan, A. L. S., Islamiati, S. H. D., Astiti, K. A., Hikmah, N., & Fasa, M. I. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Zahir Publishing.

Rosyada, D. (2020). Penelitian kualitatif untuk ilmu pendidikan. Prenada Media.

Shafwah, N., & Sianturi, R. N. (2024). Ontologi sosial dalam konteks administrasi publik: Implikasi bagi pengembangan kebijakan. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 4(6), 1036–1044.

Sundaro, H. (2022a). Positivisme Dan Post Positivisme: Refleksi Atas Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Perencanaan Kota Dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu Dan Metodologi Penelitian. Modul, 22(1), 21–30.

Sundaro, H. (2022b). Positivisme Dan Post Positivisme: Refleksi Atas Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Perencanaan Kota Dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu Dan Metodologi Penelitian. Modul, 22(1), 21–30.

Umanailo, M. (2003). Paradigma Konstruktivis. Paradigma, 75.

Utami, P. B. (2014). Strategi Komunikasi Pemasaran Melalui Endorsement pada Online Shop di Indonesia (Studi Deskriptif pada Onlineshop I Wear Banana, Alf‟ S Stuff Dan Chickhorse).